Do you know Tino Sehgal? You know, the artist that doesn't allow any pictures taken of his works? And doesn't write any introduction, or artist statement? Or make written agreements with museums? That wants no material artifacts in his works?
Does it matter what the works are?
They are performative. More: they are performances. They are people doing things in exhibition spaces. They are things happening with people within an exhibition framework.
They could be happening to others (say, someone kissing). Or to you (say, someone talking with you).
You might never discover which part was the work. Yet somehow, you often do.
Once again: Does it matter what the works are? Once you experience something, what good is the analysis?
But we are pretty smart animals. We may experience, and still want to think about it. We may want to decide what we think, and if we will go to see this thing again or not. We may rework this experience in our mind until we decide, say, that this is just not enough. That a good ice-cream would have done the job. Or a meeting with a friend. Or both combined. Maybe in a museum. Maybe accompanied by a stranger, having a conversation about progress. The luxury of conversational art. Now isn't that progressive.
Then again, what is wrong with living a series of perfectly good conversations put into a gentle, clean formal frame? Can't we just accept this? What is it that makes one (me) so voracious?
Is it the fact I've never actually seen a Sehgal, done a Sehgal?
Isn't the picture enough?
Or the reviews that seem to make a huge effort in taking the mimetic weight off the image and putting some of it on words?
Paradoxically, all the effort put into keeping it live seem to make us focus not on the thing, but on this very effort. Would Tino Sehgal be at the Guggenheim had he allowed taking pictures? So what exactly is the work, here? How come I feel it so clearly, if it's all about presence? Or am I just feeling its double, its fake, the afterthought? But isn't that crucial in experience? Doesn't that re-constitute the experience once it is over? Can one re-construct something one did not experience in the first place?
You would have to have been there. The most dreaded sentence in the world. What are we supposed to do with it? Take a hidden snapshot?
Tino Sehgal is on at the New York Guggenheim until March 10.
Search This Blog
Popular Posts
-
Here's the story: an artist is fascinated by falling . He takes pictures of himself falling off different things: ladders, trees, buildi...
-
He's been around for a while. In 2002, for instance, he made the world a better place by putting flags on high-tension electricity lines...
-
The Tea Bag garden is a landscape made of stacked bags of garden soil. The bags, padded like a bench, are essentially soft plant containers...
-
If you want to know what Tim Crouch's An Oak Tree is about, and what it is like, first read his own description . You can also read the...
-
Truly great art has the strange effect of making us, the spectators, feel intelligent. - António Damasio , director of the department of neu...
-
Exactitudes (= exact attitudes), by photographer Ari Versluis and stylist Ellie Uyttenbroek, is an exercise in style (or rather was, from ...
-
This house which is almost gone. Which still has the lines and weight of a house, yet could very well be called landscape. This house which ...
-
Just so you don't think I'm ignoring you - check out some great projects by Marc Kremers : As found , a site with images found on th...
-
In a comment in the Portuguese daily newspaper Público , my colleague Tiago Bartolomeu Costa commented on a controversial artistic residency...
-
Brick of Coke is part of the Experience the Experience project by Monochrom ( from the site : monochrom is an art-technology-philosophy gr...
Friday, 26 February 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
My Other Blogs
Archive
-
▼
2010
(453)
-
▼
February
(31)
- Almanaque Bertrand, 1934
- Reclining Deco lady
- The afterthought experience
- Almanaque Bertrand, 1934 - Fatally short-sighted (...
- Almanaque Bertrand, 1934 - Automatic cleaning cham...
- The End Is Never Nigh (A few sentences that never ...
- Almanaque Bertrand, 1934 - The Muse
- Life Magazine, 1927, She Didn't Have a Leg To Stan...
- Almanaque Bertrand, 1934 - A Well Deserved Reward
- More Gentle Uncertainty
- Almanaque Bertrand, 1934 - A True Story
- Almanaque Bertrand, 1934
- Another childish question inspired by a beautiful ...
- Visit
- Vogue, Bon Voyage
- The Landscape Is You
- Dreaming the book
- Almanaque Bertrand, 1934 - Benjamin Rabier, Monkey...
- Almanaque Bertrand, 1934 - Modesty
- Gorgeous Deco Valentine Postcard
- The unwearable jewel
- Almanaque Bertrand, 1934 - A Curious Distraction
- Audience
- Almanaque Bertrand, 1934 - 57
- T. ENAMI in NATIONAL GEOGRAPHIC MAGAZINE -- Septem...
- Almanaque Bertrand, 1934
- Almanaque Bertrand, 1934 - Ridgewell, At an antiqu...
- Almanaque Bertrand, 1934 - The beginnings of a dip...
- Almanaque Bertrand, 1934 - Useless excuses
- Almanaque Bertrand, 1934
- Almanaque Bertrand, 1934 - The aeroplane in farming
-
▼
February
(31)
0 comments:
Post a Comment